Picture
Paul Muad'Dib, as depicted by artist John Schoenherr in The Illustrated Dune (1978). Schoenherr was the original Dune illustrator, having begun drawing and painting Arrakis back when Dune first began serializing in Analog magazine in 1963! Image courtesy of ski-ffy.blogspot.com.
Rereading Frank Herbert's original Dune (1965) for 370, I am, once again, deeply impressed by the breadth and depth, the sheer scope, of Herbert's imagining, the detail and texture of the world he created, the sharpness (and bitterness) of the story's political and psychological insights, the adroitness of its maneuvering, the intense air of foreboding that the text sustains throughout, and, well, the flat-out eccentricity of the work--an eccentricity perhaps sanded off or obscured by Dune's enormous success, thorough mainstreaming, and conversion into a seemingly never-ending, now posthumous, franchise.
Simply put, Dune is an odd, odd book, a mélange (heh) of different things stirred together by sheer stubborn ingenuity. It's got so much in it: a Machiavellian interest in the politics and spectacle of power; a peculiar grafting-on of political and cultural allusions (Persian, Sassanian, Arabic, Islamic?) by way of space opera, all of it perhaps viewed through an Orientalist lens; a proto-psychedelic emphasis on a universal, mind-transforming drug; its updating of the Van Vogt-style psychic superman, now turned into a drug-powered messiah; its focus, at once skeptical and fascinated, on religion; its use of religion and power politics to talk about gender (note the novel's insistence on dividing the world into male and female spheres of influence).
During our first discussion of the book this past Thursday, Sept. 26th, we in 370 talked about most of these issues, by way of a simple ice-breaking question: How would you describe the tone of this book? Along the way we discussed Herbert's textual devices, for example his use of epigraphs from imagined texts to create foreshadowing and dramatic irony; his habit of shifting focalization (point of view), moving quickly from the interior of one character's thoughts to another, and how this shifting enables Herbert to focus on the tension between inner and outer selves (essential to his understanding of the burdens of leadership); and his way of marking these shifts through, often, italicized bits of interior monologue. The book's restless, searching manner, its intense, almost overheated characterization, its sensitivity to politics as a constant play of appearances and a constant, anxious maneuvering—all of these things depend on Herbert's use of these seemingly simple textual devices. The result is a psychologized epic, full of tension and a prevailing sense of doom. Even the book's eccentric glitches in prose style, its reliance on oxymoronic prose, mixed metaphors, and synthaesthetic descriptions to convey mystical or psychic experience, its occasional lapses into obscurity, are essential to this atmosphere. Wow, what a book. What a crazy, fun, endlessly stimulating book.
To spark class discussion of Dune's outlook on politics and authority, I did something a bit strange: I showed my students the first two minutes of President Obama's address on Syria as telecast on Sept. 10th. I stressed that I did not intend a political endorsement, nor an attack, by using this example, but meant only to encourage awareness of the staging of leadership. An excellent discussion of what it means to act out political authority followed, quite relevant, I think, to the description of Dune's Duke Leto Atreides in particular. Just as important as the book's ecological outlook, IMO, is its understanding of how appearances create and support political power.
A few last notes:


  • The SF art blog Ski-Iffy has a cool post reproducing John Schoenherr's classic Dune illustrations.

  • Speaking of Schoenherr, his son Ian Schoenherr, also an accomplished book artist, maintains a blog about his father's work, including this wonderful post about exactly when and how his father began to illustrate Dune in 1963. Sketchbook images included!
 
Picture
Photo of Dr. Kevin Grazier from the online magazine The Register, www.theregister.co.uk, 3 Nov. 2010
Building on my last post, I want to confirm that, yes, scientist Kevin R. Grazier, Ph.D. will be speaking to my English 370 class at CSU Northridge next Tuesday, October 1. This event is free and open to the public. Science fiction fans are encouraged to attend, and to spread the word!

Dr. Grazier is a former research scientist for NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the science advisor to popular TV series such as Defiance, Falling Skies, Battlestar Galactica, and Eureka as well as Alfonso Cuarón's hotly anticipated new film Gravity (which premieres next Friday, Oct. 4).

His talk on “The Science of Science Fiction” will give us a rare opportunity to discuss,
with a working scientist, the relationships among scientific research, storytelling, and popular media. I like to think it will spark interdisciplinary dialogue about the links among science, humanities scholarship, and literature. To that end, I’ve extended the invitation across CSUN to students and faculty in all disciplines, particularly the sciences.

Dr. Grazier worked at JPL for fifteen years. While there he served
as Investigation Scientist and Science Planning Engineer on the Cassini-Huygens Mission to Saturn and Titan, working particularly on the Cassini probe's imaging system, which sends pictures back to Earth. For JPL, he wrote mission-planning and analysis software that won both JPL- and NASA-wide awards. He has six university degrees in science, including an M.S. and Ph.D. in geophysics and space physics from UCLA (his PhD research focused on computer simulations of early Solar System evolution), an M.S. in physics, and B.S. degrees in computer science, geology, and physics. His research specialties include numerical method development and large-scale computer simulations of Solar System dynamics, evolution, and chaos.

Besides serving as a science adviser for films and TV shows,
Dr. Grazier is a freelance writer and editor. He co-authored the book The Science of Battlestar Galactica, edited the anthologies The Science of Dune, The Science of Michael Crichton, and Fringe Science, and collaborated on the American Chemical Society’s anthology Hollywood Chemistry. In addition, he is a veteran teacher, having taught courses in astronomy, planetary science, cosmology, the search for extraterrestrial life, and the science of SF at UCLA, Santa Monica College, and College of the Canyons. He has also worked to educate the public about science on other fronts, including talks at events such as Comic-Con International and appearances on the History Channel, Science Channel, and National Geographic.


In short, Kevin Grazier is ideally qualified to speak about the science in SF. We in 370 feel lucky to have him as a guest, and are greatly looking forward to this event!

Kevin Grazier's talk will take place at CSU Northridge on Tuesday, Oct. 1, from 12:30 to 1:45, in Jerome Richfield Hall, Room 319, a lovely venue that we in the CSUN Department of English call the Linda Nichols Joseph Reading Room.
See you there! Feel free to leave comments or questions about this event right here on our blog, of course.
Picture
Kevin Grazier at Comic-Con International, 23 July 2009, photo (via Flickr) by Dave Fayram
PS. Here are some interesting web resources about Kevin Grazier:

 
Details about this wonderful event to come!